HOME
Message Board
CURRENT COLUMNS
- Editor's Corner
- Blogfest 2005
- Commentary
- Commentary Too
- Down The Middle
- Faulking Around
- Global Warning
- This guy walks into a bar...
- Investing 101
- Faulking Opinions
- Off The Rail
- Words
ARCHIVES
LINKS
CONTACT US
 | |||
Commentary Too - Jan 24, 2006 - Printable Version
- Establishment Libs Fuel the Fires of Distraction
by Charles Katin
God, I hate Liberals. If it weren't for them, there might be a slim chance for a legitimate Opposition movement in this country, but, as it is, things look pretty hopeless. Conservatives are mindless, boot-licking zombies of the Establishment, but, Libs are, in many ways, much more easily led and distracted. The Establishment controls both, partly, through the time-tested system of Issue Politics: throwing hunks of red meat out for them to fight over, while the real agenda gets implemented without notice. Every aspect of Liberalism has been co-opted by the Establishment, so that even if enough interest isn't available, Established Lib leadership can always help to stir the waters and incite the Liberal Mob. The "issue" of Creationism in public schools is a favorite ball they like to throw around, and another non-issue served-up with plenty of fanfare and notice. The so-called "Christian Right" is heavily controlled by the Establishment. This is very obvious. The Establishment has given them marching orders to push this issue, and, along with the Establishment Press, they do a very good job of scaring "Independent Thinking" Lib citizens, as well as a host of others who feel that Creationism shouldn't be taught as a science. The fact is that Creationism will never replace the teaching of Evolution in public classrooms. While the Establishment sponsors this effort of the Christian Right, they haven't the slightest intention of seeing that it's carried through. The CR is merely duped into inciting the phony opposition Libs. The Libs convince themselves that although significant political change may not be possible, they can at least score some minor victories, such as keeping Creationism out of public schools. Actually, it's the other way around: significant political change will not occur, precisely because the Lib opposition is chasing foolishness such as this instead of questioning the legitimacy of the system itself.
Another non-issue is Abortion and "Women's Reproductive Rights." The Establishment has no intention of eliminating abortion. Just like creationism in classrooms: it's never going to happen. Anyone familiar with the most basic goals of the New World Order knows that population control is practically an obsession with these people. Loans doled out to China by the IMF are contingent upon that country's adoption of a population control program outlined by the big banks. The tactic of tying financial lending to population management is being used throughout the world. Even the most skeptical Liberals, who doubt the legitimacy of our democracy will rise to take the bait, usually as a result of having been coerced by their Lib leadership which has convinced them that they must win one battle at a time. But it's not a battle. It's all a staged debate, and the conclusion has been laid out years ago.
If anyone doubts this, all they have to do is look at the actions of the Klan (laf) and the Nazis, who are shepherded around the country in what is probably the most blatantly obvious example of contrived political disturbance. These groups were thoroughly infiltrated ages ago, yet, even when major players such as David Duke are revealed to be government agents, the Lib public can't seem to get beyond the stage show. The established Press feeds them images over the TV nonstop of a handful of duped idiots and agent-provocateurs carrying Nazi flags and marching around some little town in the Midwest. Indignant citizens screech against the "haters," while the government goons explain that "this is what Democracy is all about." These operations are routinely debunked by those who follow such events, and I'm not going to bother getting into the specifics here. Certainly, there are people in the country who are "Nazis," and believe the political doctrine associated with the movement, yet, their legitimate membership is so miniscule that it's laughable; yet, the Establishment enjoys trotting them out on regular occasions, painting them as a "threat to democracy" and rallying Lib sentiment around yet another hoaxed "cause."
Even my hometown of Marblehead was visited this summer by the oh-so-notorious Southboro Baptist Church, who stage "protests" at soldier's funerals on the grounds that the US military somehow supports "fag" culture. They celebrate the death of the soldier, thank God for the terrorists who killed him, and shout, "God hates fags" at the astounded onlookers. Fred Phelps, the leader of the group, has a long history of creating disturbances like this. I was able to attend a funeral here and see them in action. It was really something else. The protestors were squired in and out of town by heavy police escorts. The Feds contacted the local police to make sure that these whackos were given a spot to protest right across the street from the church (the town had originally intended on giving them space much further away and out of view; but, after being contacted by State and Federal authorities, they bent over backwards to get them as close to the action as possible.) The protest served to galvanize nationalistic feeling at an event that very often serves as the seeding ground for opposition sentiment. Many coffins are coming back to the country, and people in these small towns naturally question the why this person died. It rekindles discussion about the Iraq war and many people have serious questions to ask. The Southboro Baptist Church goes to as many of these funerals as possible. They draw attention. The newspapers here frequently described them as "War protestors" (which, they certainly were NOT.) People were incredibly angry during their demonstration and afterwards. Any genuine anti-war sentiment would have been squelched right there on the spot. The press often described the crowd as "united" in feeling when confronted with the "protestors." The press also played off the irony that the soldier died to ensure their right to protest. The presence of the "protestors" justified enormous police presence at the event. There were SWAT teams and snipers on rooftops. Law enforcement organizations I had never heard of were there. Anyone who researches this group will find many strange things. Weirdest of all is that Phelps himself... is a Democrat! He was invited to BOTH of Clinton's inaugural balls.
Anyone who doubts that the system is controlled to such an extent should ask why the Libs laid down and died after two obviously fraudulent elections. The evidence was all over the place. Gore and Kerry were slated to lose, and the orders were that the disgruntled Dems were to drop any unpleasant investigations. Of course, the Establishment had to alibi Kerry's defeat to a bewildered electorate, who couldn't figure out how Bush had won a second election. The Puppet Masters had searched far and wide for the most unappealing candidate possible, an elitist Kennedy poseur with the same creepy Skull and Bones background as Bush: a classic milquetoast Lib who offered no observably different position regarding the War, or anything else. Even after finding the worst candidate possible, the Establishment had to prepare for the inevitable question: who voted for Bush? As if on que, immediately after the votes were (supposedly) counted, they explained that the Libs were threatening "traditional values" with the issue of Gay Marriage. And that was that. Forget how they were able to arrive at this analysis so soon after the election (no other reason was given- this was the "official" explanation, handed down by the "experts") and try and appreciate the bizarre synchronicity of these two events. The gay political leadership wants to enact their marriage legislation. So, what do they do? They wait until an election year to light the fuse. How amazingly stupid. One would think that the gay politicos would be more astute than this, and wait until after the election (and a Lib President) to make their proposals law. But, no. They decide that spring/summer of 2004 is the right time, and the Press has a field day with the issue. If this weren't enough to seal the doom of the Lib bid, the whole circus starts in Kerry's home state of Massachusetts! Can this simply be political ineptness on the part of gay political organizations? Or, could it be that these organizations are also steered and controlled by higher forces? It's much too unlikely to be a coincidence, and the issue served a very useful purpose for legitimating the election hoax. If people stopped to ask one another about the issue itself, they would find that very few people feel passionately about this at all. Once again, a hoaxed cause serves a specific political purpose, and the Established Libs are right in the thick of it.
If you think this is too contrived, or that such coordination and control is impossible (or, if you believe that Presidential elections are real,) consider even simpler scenarios, such as when the Bush elements really overlook something, and the ever-vigilant opposition is nowhere to be found.
What about the Jeff Gannon scandal? Gay prostitutes visiting the White House with connections into the Plame Affair? This was easily enough to bring down the current administration. Where was the "Opposition?" Again, when faced with a legitimate slam-dunk scandal, the Lib leadership focuses attention elsewhere. Where was the Lib lynch mob after 9/11? Where was the Opposition outcry for a tough investigation?
The nature of this control mechanism is beyond the scope of this essay, but, these examples should prove that the entire process is indeed controlled: from the elections, to the reporting, and most of all, to the fraudulent "issue groups" which are used to steer public understanding of events and camouflage the corruption of our entire political system. To rephrase Menken's famous quote, "If voting accomplished anything, it would be illegal": if a legitimate opposition party existed, it would be illegal.
Voice your opinion on our message board (you don't have to sign up to post).